Votes
Answers
Views
Question
2
1
42
asked 7 years ago by linuxskywalker
updated 7 years ago by jeffrey-gardner-1
In our testing environment, we are using LoadRunner 12.01. We would like to know if LoadRunner 12.01 supports Kerberos tokenization? Any input would be great.
2
1
42
Is there a way to install Microsoft Office 64-bit on my UFT12 client? Looks like these two don't work well together.
2
1
42
asked 9 years ago by coltsfan12
updated 9 years ago by mrwhite
When we have a large automated test script run out of ALM to UFT 12.02, a test with large iteration count and a very large run results output, ALM 11.52 fails the test. When looking at the log, all steps pass. And when running the test locally with UFT, it passes and generates report. It would seem ...
1
2
42
Tags:
I would like to have the 'requirement name' field auto populated whenever a new requirement is created. For example, the first requirement would be ABC-1000, the second requirement would be ABC-1001, and so on. I am wondering if this is possible.
5
1
42
asked 13 years ago by pumpkin
updated 13 years ago by bubblehead712
QTP can record, but not playback, a Java button click. I verified that the button and all its hierarchy are valid objects. Does anybody have a suggestion?
0
1
42
We just completed the audit and got penalized for having more global users on line at one time than I have licensed. WE are moving to 12.55 and I am wondering if there is a method to ensure I don't violate my usage allowance. Seems kind of mean to penalize me but not supply a way for me to ensure I ...
6
1
42
asked 13 years ago by derlweldon
updated 13 years ago by sammyh
We are getting and Invalid field name error for project we upgraded from v9.2 Any Ideas? See Error Below. Error at Line 1131, (character 3) Invalid field name: ==================== Sub SetFieldApp( FieldName, Vis, Req, PNo, VOrder ) 'Sets a field's appearance ==> With Bug_Fields(FieldName) .IsVisibl...
2
1
42
ALM Server is in a Data Center Environment (production, hardened), while UFT license server is currently running in a lab environment. Want to ensure there is no conflict in having the UFT license server co-located on the ALM box.