Votes
Answers
Views
Question
3
votes
1
answer
61
views
asked 4 years ago by test4life
updated 4 years ago by josh-yates
Category:
Application Lifecycle Management
Can we create custom issue types in ALM Octane?
2
votes
1
answer
60
views
asked 4 years ago by coleslaw
updated 4 years ago by jameslcoleman
Category:
Application Lifecycle Management
♥ 1
Hello. We would like to remove the Domain from the subject line, so that it just displays the Project Name, Defect ID#, and the Defect Summary. Will this be possible?
3
votes
2
answers
271
views
asked 5 years ago by jameslcoleman
updated 4 years ago by coleslaw
Category:
Application Lifecycle Management
♥ 2
Hello. I am looking to display a custom message on the qcbin page, and I am wanting to see if there is another way of doing this besides the method discussed in the following post: https://eyeontesting.com/answers/i-would-like-to-display-a-message-on-the-qcbin-pag/
0
votes
1
answer
200
views
asked 6 years ago by kaptainkayoss
updated 6 years ago by rich-text
Is there a way to create custom hooking for an addin in UFT for our application?
0
votes
1
answer
298
views
asked 6 years ago by kaptainkayoss
updated 6 years ago by rich-text
How can I create my own log file in UFT to log application items besides using the UFT report? I'm just looking to create something very basic.
0
votes
1
answer
126
views
asked 6 years ago by kaptainkayoss
updated 6 years ago by rich-text
Can we add our own object properties to an object to help make it unique in UFT? Will we be able to use it for object identification?
2
votes
1
answer
81
views
asked 7 years ago by godawgs
updated 7 years ago by David Hall
I am looking to add a few new columns into the test set view for all our users. Our project already uses some custom columns, at least through TC_USER_04. I would like to be able to add on another 6 more without modifying the existing columns. Mainly looking for help on the proper steps to do this w...
1
vote
1
answer
264
views
asked 8 years ago by neena
updated 8 years ago by bubblehead712
We use a very small UFT 12.02 extensibility to test DHTMLX. After running a test with the extensibility add-in selected, if we close UFT and restart it without the addin a standard UFT test fails to properly identify WebCheckBoxes. Once extensibility is used the UFT instance is permanently corrupted...
0
votes
1
answer
36
views
asked 8 years ago by pumpkin
updated 8 years ago by bubblehead712
I am running a rest script and when I look at the body of my request I can see the + sign (See Below) but according to development that is being removed before the call is being processed. Here is the body of my call grant_type=password&username=zzzzzzzzzz&AuthType=3&DeviceAuthToken=abcdabcd+abcdabc...